Is Extraordinary Evidence Needed to Prove the Resurrection? | Tough Questions Answered

Is Extraordinary Evidence Needed to Prove the Resurrection? | Tough Questions Answered

viaIs Extraordinary Evidence Needed to Prove the Resurrection? | Tough Questions Answered.

viaIs Extraordinary Evidence Needed to Prove the Resurrection? | Tough Questions Answered.

Advertisements

One response to this post.

  1. Some people revel in believing the absurd. Ti’s better to assume that the supposed witnesses had single and collective visions as Paul himself had, and thus he was no witness himself. Who verified that those five hundred saw the same vision?
    Many others accomplished what Alexander did so the comparison is absurd! No evidence exists for the Resurrection-just a tall tale,folks!
    We skeptics-open-minded- thus have no reason to take up his chharge to read any of those books as they all suffer these deficiencies.No, he should take our charge to fathom the facts about mass hallucinations. We have evidence for such, and thus that counts against his supposed evidence.
    David Hume’s corollary to the presumption of naturalism still stands as against miracles unless one can upend it with facts.
    Jim Jones and Granville Oral Roberts claim to have brought others from death to life, but they didn’t no matter what any witnesses might say!
    Skepticism for that more abundant life.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: